Validation Analysis of LMS-BIDAK for Literacy Learning in Higher Education

Authors

  • Otang Kurniaman Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Hadriana Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Nur Islami Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Zetra Hainul Putra Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Radini Universitas Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/anthor.v5i1.423

Keywords:

LMS-BIDAK, Literacy Learning, Validation Analysis

Abstract

The development of technology has changed literacy learning so that it is necessary to develop a Learning Management System (LMS)-BIDAK (Bacalah (Read), Identifikasi (Identify), Diskusikan (Discuss), Aksi (Action), Kesimpulan (Conclusion)) before it is used, the product that has been developed needs to be validated. The purpose of the study was to see the validation of the LMS-BIDAK product so that it is suitable for use in literacy learning. The research method used was a quantitative method with nine expert validators in language, media and content. The results of the study were taken from the assessment of media experts with an average of LMS-BIDAK design of 93.75 with a very good category, LMS-BIDAK software of 92.26, and LMS-BIDAK benefits of 95.83 very good. The assessment of language experts on the aspect of content feasibility with an average of 93.75 very good, the aspect of presentation feasibility of 89.58 good, the linguistic aspect of 88.1 good, and the graphic aspect of 93.1 very good. The assessment of material/content experts on the learning design aspect was 88.89 good, the material aspect with an average of 91.67 was very good, and the benefit aspect in the content was 95.84 very good, so it is concluded that LMS-BIDAK is suitable for use in literacy learning in higher education.

References

Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. (2020). EBook interaction logs as a tool in predicting learner performance in reading. Asiatic, 14(1), 174–188. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85090691667.

Arlinwibowo, J., Retnawati, H., & Kartowagiran, B. (2022). The impact of ICT utilization to improve the learning outcome: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(2), 522-531. DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22112.

Aththibby, A. R. (2022). Pengembangan Model Mobile Laboratory Based Learning (MLBL) Berbantu Modul Terintegrasi Augmented Reality (AR) Untuk Meningkatan Motivasi, Keterampilan Proses Sains, dan Kreativitas Pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Dasar 1. Disertasi. Yogyakarya: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2023). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An updated framework and conceptual model. Computers in Human Behavior, 155, 107289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107289.

Başar, M. (2017). Effect of the SQ4R technique on the reading comprehension of elementary school 4th grade elementary school students. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1029a.

Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies reading and writing in context. Routledge.

Cladwell, J. S. (2008). Comprehension Assessment:A Classroom Guide. New York: The Guilford Press.

Chanyawudhiwan, G., & Mingsiritham, K. (2022). An Analysis of Elderly Use of Digital Technology in Thailand. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 16(07), 173-181.

Damaianti, V. S., Abidin, Y., & Rahma, R. (2020). Higher order thinking skills-based reading literacy assessment instrument: An Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 513-525. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28600.

Djuanda, D. (2006). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Yang Komunikatif Dan Menyenangkan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Ertz, M., Reynaud, E., & Chauvin, S. (2023). Enhancing learning experiences through well-designed educational content: The importance of quality in educational materials. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 18(4), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.104115.

Hautala, J., Heikkil, R., Nieminen, L., Rantanen, V., Latvala, J. M., and Richardson, U. (2020). Identification of Reading Difficulties by a Digital Game-Based Assessment Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0(0), 1–26. DOI: 10.1177/0735633120905309.

Haq, M. S., Samani, M., Karwanto, K., & Hariyati, N. (2022). Android-Based Digital Library Application Development. iJIM, 16 (11), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i11.32055.

Katarina, B., Christine, G., & Susanne, F. (2020). Views of Swedish Elder Care Personnel on Ongoing Digital Transformation: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e15450. https://doi.org/10.2196/15450.

König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., and Glutsch, N. (2020).Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650.

Kargin, T., Güldenoğlu, I. B., & Gengeç, H. (2023). The Role of Early Literacy Skills in Beginning to Read in Turkish: Longitudinal Findings from First Graders. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 10(2), 26-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.23.27.10.2.

Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Chan, E. (2024). Collaborative learning and the development of critical thinking: A case study of syntactic approaches. Journal of Educational Research, 78(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedures.2024.105678.

Kurniaman, O., Charlina, C., & Noviana, E. (2018). Implementasi DRTA Strategy for Elementary School. Beau Bassin: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Lyesmaya, D., Musthafa, B., and Sunendar, D. (2020). Local wisdom value’s-based literacy education learning model

in elementary school. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1470, 1-7. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012030.

Mulyati, Y., & Cahyani, I. (2015). Keterampilan Berbahasa Indonesia SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Małgorzata. O., & Krystyna, B. (2020). Education and Digital Competencies of Elder Adults. Kultura—Społeczeństwo—Edukacja. 165–185.

Moura, R. F., Barros, F., & Lima, J. (2023). Efficiency and usability in learning management systems: A framework for performance improvement. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 32(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-023-09676-7.

Majid, A., Mustafa, S., & Qureshi, R. (2024). Learning management systems and academic achievement: A structural model approach. Educational Research Review, 39, 100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100523.

Pilgrim, J., and Martinez, E. E. (2013). Defining Literacy in the 21st Century: A Guide to Terminology and Skills. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 1(1), 60-69.

Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., & Delgado, C. (2024). Impact of text readability in learning management systems on students’ performance and engagement. Computers & Education, 212, 104792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104792.

Sefriani, R., Sepriana, R., Wijaya, I., Radyuli, P., and Menrisal, M. (2021). Blended learning with Edmodo: The effectiveness of statistical learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(1), 293. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20826.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Simpson, M., & Boud, D. (2023). Formative evaluation in higher education: Its role in promoting deep learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.1035678.

Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Membaca sebagai suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa Bandung.

Tabassum, R., Raza, M., & Khan, M. (2023). Setting clear learning objectives to enhance student outcomes: A framework for effective instructional design. Journal of Instructional Design, 44(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/21586742.2023.1015673.

Tegeh, I. M., Jampel, I. N., & Pudjawan, K. (2014). Model Penelitian Pengembangan. Singaraja: Graha Ilmu.

Thomas, G., Richardson, J., & Harris, P. (2023). Structuring educational content for maximum learning: The impact of systematic organization on student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0001024.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Kurniaman, O., Hadriana, H., Islami, N., Putra, Z. H., & Radini, R. (2026). Validation Analysis of LMS-BIDAK for Literacy Learning in Higher Education. ANTHOR: Education and Learning Journal, 5(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.31004/anthor.v5i1.423

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.